Cycles-RPG

Strange things happen. I was supposed to post an actual play review (AP) I have already written at the forge. But then, it turned out into something else ; which requires my attention and changes how I had plan to deal with this play test.

Okay, the play test, first :
- We were going to play test Burning Wheel, by Luke Crane, in the context of Avalanche
- While at it, we decided to introduce rpg to Julie (and Denys), who's going to give us a hand with marketing and promotion
- We were supposed to play a single session
- There was a BIG mess concerning character creation in the context of introducing new players
- We turned out to play three sessions
- I was evinced as a DM from the game
- I reported those three sessions at the forge and then "JoyWriter" came in and ask some philosophical questions
- We also talked about the use of "short sessions", or "introduction product"
- Francis has much to say about the game

So, well, the thread at the forge is a real mess. Too much stuff there ; I need to segment it.
That brings me to :
- Maybe tell you a bit more about how we plan to use the blog (and we have used it so far) ; the reason for which I need to separate stuff down.
- Get an overall strategy for BW. This system, used in the context of Avalanche, won't be settled in a single play testing.
- Prepare something like a review, once the play test is over ; and see where it fits best.
- Finish to present the webcomic "from the deep", as I need it to explain the crescendo of Avalanche, but also to have a complete product for a demo.
- Present our strategy for the "beta" testers and define our strategy for the alpha ones.
- Write something down about philosophy and Avalanche.

well, seems like those are the stuff this is coming.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Version abrégée. Je devais faire un compte rendu de partie tout simple. Et bien non, cette partie va nous générer pas mal de travail et d'explications. Un programme à mettre en oeuvre par le biais de ce blog.